
For editors, one of the most tempting headlines to write when devastating or shocking events happen—such as Russia’s invasion of Ukraine—is to say that the world has changed. Generally this has the merit of some truth. What is harder to say is how that will happen, or where the changes might lead. That is especially so now, when Russia’s new imperialism has followed a series of similarly world-changing shocks.
At such times, the right conclusion is not that a new or well-defined world order is being created as many predicted. A new Cold War or a bipolar world divided into two clear camps has not materialised. Rather, the new shock has broken old assumptions and widened the range of possible paths that the world might take.
Instead of grasping for new certainties, we need to accept that we are in an age of quite radical uncertainty, one…
Register today to continue reading
You’ve hit your limit of three articles in the last 30 days. To get seven more, simply enter your email address below.
You’ll also receive our free e-book Prospect’s Top Thinkers and our newsletter with the best new writing on politics, economics, literature and the arts.
Prospect may process your personal information for our legitimate business purposes, to provide you with newsletters, subscription offers and other relevant information.
Click here to learn more about these purposes and how we use your data. You will be able to opt-out of further contact on the next page and in all our communications.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Already a subscriber? Log in here