
Keir Starmer and his wife arriving at Labour conference. Photo: PA Images / Alamy Stock Photo
I have changed my mind.
For more than 40 years I have argued against Britain using proportional representation to elect its MPs. I saw benefits in a system in which MPs answered to local constituents, and governments were chosen by voters on election day, not by politicians cobbling together coalitions in the weeks afterwards.
Those benefits remain (although the increasing prevalence of hung parliaments has weakened the choice-of-government argument). But for a range of reasons, the balance has tilted towards a different, more proportional, system. In the next few days, the Labour Party conference is likely to…
Register today to continue reading
You’ve hit your limit of three articles in the last 30 days. To get seven more, simply enter your email address below.
You’ll also receive our free e-book Prospect’s Top Thinkers and our newsletter with the best new writing on politics, economics, literature and the arts.
Prospect may process your personal information for our legitimate business purposes, to provide you with newsletters, subscription offers and other relevant information.
Click here to learn more about these purposes and how we use your data. You will be able to opt-out of further contact on the next page and in all our communications.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Already a subscriber? Log in here